Skip to main content

INDUSTRIAL HEMP LEGISILATION IN KARNATAKA



The serial advent of international conventions over drug and its illicit trafficking pressured India to implement its provisions and objects at the federal level and hence The Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 was enacted. Section 14 of the said act provides special provision relating to cannabis for the purpose of industry and horticulture. Recently the Government of Uttarakhand providing licenses for farmers to grow hemp or cannabis for industrial purposes under the above provision of law.

Prior to the enactment of NDPS Act, 1985, the majority of states in India have adopted the policy of prohibition and excise over the intoxicating drugs and intoxicating drinks. The policy of prohibition and Excise in Karnataka is governed by the Karnataka Prohibition Act, 1961 and The Karnataka Excise Act, 1965 respectively. The prohibition act imposes prohibition over intoxicating drinks and drugs and formulate exceptions to certain reasonable other purposes such as scientific, commercial, medicinal, industrial., and as such other purposes. 

After the enactment of Karnataka Excise Act, the policy of prohibition has been relaxed to regulate, control, and carryout the liquor trade in the Karnataka State. However the prohibition Act was not repealed and is still under the regulatory control of excise department.

The preamble of the Karnataka Prohibition Act is as under,

“An Act to amend and consolidate the law relating to the promotion and enforcement of and carrying out the policy of prohibition in the state of Karnataka.
Whereas, it is expedient to amend and consolidate the law relating to the promotion and enforcement of and carrying out the policy of prohibition of consumption except for medicinal purposes of intoxicating drinks and drugs and to provide for certain other purposes hereinafter appearing; “

Under the prohibition act, section 23 enables the authority to provide licenses for bona fide medicinal or other purposes. Section 23 reads as follows,

Section 23: Licenses for bona fide medicinal purposes:

The State Government, or, subject to its control, the Deputy Commissioner, may grant license to any person or in respect of any institution, whether under the management of Government or not, for the manufacture, export, import, transport, sale, possession, consumption or use of liquor, any intoxicating drug or hemp or any article containing liquor, intoxicating drug or hemp on the ground that such liquor, intoxicating drug, hemp or article is required by such person or in respect of such institution for a bona fide medicinal, scientific, industrial or such like purpose, or for sale, for any of the aforesaid purposes:
Provided that when any liquor, intoxicating drug, or hemp has been obtained by any person for a bona fide medicinal purpose from any person or institution, licensed to sell the same under this section, it shall not be necessary for such person to obtain a licence for the possession, consumption or use of the same

So far as Section 23 is concerned, the only set of rules made under this section is The Karnataka Prohibition (Intoxicating Drugs) Rules, 1966, whereas, the entire set of rules is only concerned about the recreational part of the cannabis/hemp plant, the intent of the legislator has been miscarried by the rule making authority by not considering the industrial utility of the hemp plant.

Rule No. 46 in the miscellaneous part of the above set of rules is as stated as under;

46. Destruction of seeds, etc.- The commissioner may order the sowing of such quantity of seeds in such manner as he deems fit and the destruction by such officers as he may authorize the seeds, stalk leaves and other refuse of hemp plants.

If the rules made under Sec.23 of KPA, 1961 was to make use hemp for industrial purposes as the legislator intended, the need for rule no. 46 of the above set of rule would not have been arises, since the seeds, stalk leaves and other refuge of hemp is what the raw materials for an industrial unit.

Hence there is a serious part on the state government to act on this issue and rectify the rules made under section 23 of Karnataka Prohibition Act which will be a boon to the hemp industry in Karnataka whereas it is lacking its pace due to heavy import burden of raw materials from the China, Canada, Uttarkhand, amounting to huge price burden on hemp products, that may not be utilizable by the people at large.

Comments

  1. National economy will be boosted there will be employment opportunity for youths

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Supreme court on natural justice

      Maneka Gandhi vs Union Of India 1978 AIR 597, 1978 SCR (2) 621 ; There can be no distinction between a quasi-judicial function and an administrative function for the purpose of principles of natural justice. The aim of both administrative inquiry as well as the quasi-judicial inquiry is to arrive at a just decision and if a rule of natural justice is calculated to secure justice or to put it 'negatively, to prevent miscarriage of justice, it is difficult to see why it should be applicable to quasi- judicial inquiry and not to administrative inquiry. It must logically apply to both. It cannot be said that the requirements of fair play in action is any the less in an administrative inquiry than in a quasi-judicial one. Sometimes an unjust decision in an administrative inquiry may have far more serious consequences than a decision in a quasi-judicial inquiry and hence rules of natural justice must apply, equally in an administrative inquiry which entails civil consequences

Legal maxim

                     A Legal Maxim is an established principle or proposition. The Latin term, apparently a variant on maxi-ma, is not to be found in Roman law with any meaning exactly analogous to that of a legal maxim in the Medieval or modern sense of the word, but the treatises of many of the Roman jurists on Regular definitions, and Sententiae juris are, in some measure, collections of maxims. Most of the Latin maxims developed in the Medieval era in European countries that used Latin as their language for law and courts. A A mensa et thoro - From bed and board. A vinculo matrimonii - From the bond of matrimony. Ab extra - From outside. Ab initio - From the beginning. Absoluta sententia expositore non indiget - An absolute judgment needs no expositor. Abundans cautela non nocet - Abundant caution does no harm. Accessorium non ducit sed sequitur suum principale - An accessory does not draw, but follows its principal. Accessorius sequitur - One who is an acc